My first lesson, in its almost two hours of length, started strong but did, with the introduction of an activity students were not well-enough prepared for, crumbled a bit at its end. My second lesson, because it was extremely short, did not have the opportunity to get to a stage where it would crumble, but I don't think that it would have had I been given more time.
While the 11th grade is an extremely small and quiet class, with seven students when full and four at the time of my lesson, the 10th grade is slightly larger and a lot chattier. Having an easily distractible class for 35 minutes is far from ideal.
But, as it turns out, I didn't need to worry. The students were reading The Kite Runner and my lesson plan involved reading chapter 17 aloud before assigning small, opinion-based paragraphs for students to write in the remaining time. However, my CT did not cover chapter 16 in the class before, so I ended up editing my lesson plan on the spot (something which, by now, is second nature to me).
I ended up spending most of the class period reading both chapters, not even finishing the second. Because the lesson involved sitting and reading along with me, I had no problems with maintaining my students' attention. However, in order to keep some semblance of a lesson that teaches rather than just reading aloud, I stopped with two minutes to spare, asking students to write down the prompt that they would need to finish three more pages of the novel to fully understand. I told students to finish the prompt for homework, after reading the unfinished three pages, but this caused a bit more confusion because I would not be there to collect the homework and, unknown to me, the 10th grade, unlike the 11th grade, does not usually have homework assignments mid-week. They also do not usually do their readings at home, though my CT took the opportunity to tell students that this would be changing (though even the 11th grade does not read the books during the school week - they are given the books to read over winter break and are expected to have finished them before returning for a second semester).
I'm trying to find a moral to my first two lessons, and ultimately I think that's its just that I didn't know the students and the classroom life very well before planning lessons. I don't think that the unforeseen differences between what I've seen before (as a teacher and a student) necessarily is derivative of the cultural differences between countries, especially since this is an international school that uses the IB program. I think, more than anything, my lack of preparation has to do with the strange schedule I've been meeting with this practicum: I spent a little, concentrated amount of time in the two classrooms and haven't let the students and their classroom habits settle in yet. I also haven't had all the downtime to talk to my CT that a full school day would allow.
Excuses aside, I have one remaining lesson where I will be teaching a poem to the 10th graders. While preparing for it, I'll try to gain more information about the class I'm entering before finalizing a lesson plan.
This blog highlights the work of Boston College student teachers who have embarked on a mission to set the world aflame, while collaborating with BC's mission to develop a broad world view in future educators.
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Lesson Reflection 1
While not specifically required of an international practicum, I knew before coming abroad that I would want to try teaching lessons abroad. Thankfully, my CT this semester has been extremely helpful and accommodating, allowing me to teach two lessons thus far, with a third coming soon.
Both lessons I taught at ISL introduced new challenges for me in my student teaching career, though not necessarily because of the cultural differences of a different country. Firstly, I only stay at ISL for one grade's English class, as opposed to remaining at the school for the entire day like I did last semester. Not only do I not see the same lesson taught multiple times like I did last semester, but I also have split my days between two grade levels, meaning that with two days left, I have only seen the 10th graders twice and the second time I met with them, I taught the lesson. Having to teach to students I barely know seems extremely difficult, but I cannot help but feel that it's like taking the practicum training wheels off, since I will be teaching students I've never met before on every first day of school.
The school itself also supplied me with new challenges. At ISL, there are 35 minute blocks and the class periods I have shadowed have been one, two, or three blocks long. My first lesson, to the 11th graders, was three blocks long, lasting a whopping one hour and 45 minutes. My second lesson, demanding in its own way, was one block long and lasted only 35 minutes. Considering all my previous lessons were somewhere around 50 minutes to an hour long, dealing with new time constraints while maximizing time and keeping students engaged was a challenge I'm not sure I met.
For my first lesson, the longer one, I was introducing a discussion of the second generation of characters in Wuthering Heights. I began the lesson asking students to brainstorm characteristics and quotations of both first and second generation characters and then asking them to join a discussion comparing first and second generation characters. Then, utilizing a previous assignment that my CT had given students, I asked a student who had compiled notes on the second generation's Catherine to share with the class, while others took notes. Finally, I introduced a writing prompt, asking students to plan a three paragraph essay and then write one of the paragraphs.
For the first lesson, the beginning half went extremely well, as students began to open up with the informal discussion and were given ample time to write down things that they could then suggest in discussion. However, the students were confused by the writing prompt and definitely would have benefitted from an example. I did realize their confusion and I both reiterated the instructions to the class as a whole as well as working with almost all students one on one to develop their own ideas. I had intended for students to grade each others' paragraphs in class, but because time ran over, they ended up taking each others' paragraphs home to grade for homework. If I were going to teach these students again, I would try to incorporate paragraph writing as well, but with more emphasis on what will be required of them for IB tests and in a more straightforward and example-based manner.
Both lessons I taught at ISL introduced new challenges for me in my student teaching career, though not necessarily because of the cultural differences of a different country. Firstly, I only stay at ISL for one grade's English class, as opposed to remaining at the school for the entire day like I did last semester. Not only do I not see the same lesson taught multiple times like I did last semester, but I also have split my days between two grade levels, meaning that with two days left, I have only seen the 10th graders twice and the second time I met with them, I taught the lesson. Having to teach to students I barely know seems extremely difficult, but I cannot help but feel that it's like taking the practicum training wheels off, since I will be teaching students I've never met before on every first day of school.
The school itself also supplied me with new challenges. At ISL, there are 35 minute blocks and the class periods I have shadowed have been one, two, or three blocks long. My first lesson, to the 11th graders, was three blocks long, lasting a whopping one hour and 45 minutes. My second lesson, demanding in its own way, was one block long and lasted only 35 minutes. Considering all my previous lessons were somewhere around 50 minutes to an hour long, dealing with new time constraints while maximizing time and keeping students engaged was a challenge I'm not sure I met.
For my first lesson, the longer one, I was introducing a discussion of the second generation of characters in Wuthering Heights. I began the lesson asking students to brainstorm characteristics and quotations of both first and second generation characters and then asking them to join a discussion comparing first and second generation characters. Then, utilizing a previous assignment that my CT had given students, I asked a student who had compiled notes on the second generation's Catherine to share with the class, while others took notes. Finally, I introduced a writing prompt, asking students to plan a three paragraph essay and then write one of the paragraphs.
For the first lesson, the beginning half went extremely well, as students began to open up with the informal discussion and were given ample time to write down things that they could then suggest in discussion. However, the students were confused by the writing prompt and definitely would have benefitted from an example. I did realize their confusion and I both reiterated the instructions to the class as a whole as well as working with almost all students one on one to develop their own ideas. I had intended for students to grade each others' paragraphs in class, but because time ran over, they ended up taking each others' paragraphs home to grade for homework. If I were going to teach these students again, I would try to incorporate paragraph writing as well, but with more emphasis on what will be required of them for IB tests and in a more straightforward and example-based manner.
Observation of a Lesson Taught By My CT
Journal #3
This past
Tuesday I was able to go back to Scoil Bride for my 9th time and I
observed a phonics lesson taught by my teacher. This was the first time I had
witnessed a phonics lesson because I normally go to the school on Wednesdays,
which allows me to witness math, reading and Gaelic instruction, which is the
Irish language. The phonics lesson started with my teacher going over a
familiar sound, “aw”. She first wrote the sound on the board and asked the
class to raise their hands if they knew how to say this sound. One student
raised their hand and answered her question correctly. My teacher then went on
with the lesson by explaining that this one sound could be written in three
different ways, “a”, “aw” and “al”. My teacher asked the class to take a minute
and think of example words that could be put into these three categories for
the sound “aw”. One by one students raised their hands and contributed example
words like “hawk”, “all”, “walk” and more. As each student contributed a word,
my teacher repeated the word and stated why a word belonged in a certain
category. After about 10 minutes of students contributing example words, my
teacher thanked all the students for their words and then asked the students to
get out their phonics notebooks. This was a common aspect of the lesson, so the
students understood that this meant opening their notebooks to the next
available page, creating three lined columns and waiting for a new list of
words to be written on the board. Once this new list of words was written on
the board, the students would then separate the words into the three different
sounds, “a”, “aw” and “al”. My teacher wrote 10 words on the board utilizing
all three sound types and the students set off to work on categorizing the ten
words into the proper column. I was amazed at how fast these students were able
to get focused and start working on the task at hand, but this most likely due
to the fact that it is the last week in April and they have been doing phonics
since the beginning of the year. My teacher and I circulated the classroom
looking over the student’s shoulders to make sure students were working on the
assignment and that they were not in need of any help. After another 10
minutes, my teacher reminded the students that once they were done with
categorizing the words, they were to use 4 of the words in a sentence and while
they did so, they should try to incorporate some examples of adjectives. Unsurprisingly,
this assignment was easier for some students than others, so after students had
finished both the categorization of words and their four sentences, they were
then instructed to read a book silently. I am not sure if I have mentioned this
in my first post but my class has many learning disabilities, mainly dyslexia,
so though I would describe my students as fairly bright for first grade, some
assignments can prove to be frustrating and more time consuming for some of the
students. My teacher is very good about circulating around the students that
might need a little more attention when lessons involve potentially confusing
concepts like similar sounds in different words. My teacher has a very strong
sense of pacing for her students; in fact I would say one of her strengths is
tapping into when students are struggling with concepts or when they are
breezing through another concept. I have enjoyed watching her teach lessons
because she seems to really understand her students and though learning
disabilities can add some road blocks in a lesson, she rolls with the pauses
and confusion from her students very gracefully. I hope to emulate that sort of
understanding of my student’s needs in my next practicum in the fall. One thing
I have struggled with in the past is pacing during a lesson, so I am hoping to
work on that next semester!
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Reflection on Equity and Social Justice
One main difference I have observed between my school in
Ireland and schools I have been placed at in Boston is classroom demographics.
There is much greater age diversity within a single classroom at Scoil Mhuire than
I have ever encountered in America. The age span within the third-class
classroom includes 8, 9 and 10 year olds. Within this school system, children
may be enrolled and begin formal schooling any time between their fourth and
sixth birthdays. I talked about this wide age gap with one of my Irish
roommates at University College Cork and she said oftentimes the younger
students tend to take a gap year rather than going straight to university like
their older peers so that there isn’t such a wide gap between them and their
peers upon entering college. This suggests that the students, particularly the
younger students, are aware of the wide age span within a single grade level
and feel its affects. The wide age span has led to developmental and maturity level
differences between the students in the classroom, both socially and in
academics.
The wide age span naturally creates a greater degree of
maturity levels within a single classroom. The older students may be
developmentally ready for certain academic concepts or social interactions
while for the younger students such concepts might not yet be developmentally
appropriate. This leads to a greater need for differentiation within lessons
and teaching practices in order to meet the needs of all students on differing
developmental levels within a single classroom. My CT has discussed with me the
challenges she’s faced in having such a wide age range within a single
classroom, and how she must keep on top of some students to prevent them from
coasting while others require additional supports to keep up (these differences
often time corresponding to the age of the students). My experiences within
this classroom at Scoil Mhuire have increased my awareness of exactly how wide
a range of developmental and maturity levels a teacher may have within one
classroom. In order to meet the needs of all one’s students and promote
equitable teaching practices, lesson differentiation and recognizing that
students come to school with all sorts of particular needs and strengths is
necessary.
Through classroom observation, I have witnessed how my CT
attempts to promote equity by differentiating her lessons to meet the needs of
all her students. She does not expect all of her students to perform on the
same level, as that would be impossible, yet she still holds them all to high
standards, expects them to be challenged and to work toward improving their personal
bests. For example, the youngest student in the class struggles with her
academics, particularly in math. My CT allows this student to use resources,
such as a times table chart, to help her solve math problems and when orally
quizzing the students on their times tables, will write down the problem for
this particular student so that the student has a visual and the math becomes more
concrete. My CT does not presume that this student cannot complete the work, or
give her simpler problems to solve; rather she provides scaffolds and resources
to help this student arrive at an answer.
Conversely, the oldest student is the class is incredibly
advanced in her English and writing skills. This student is given higher
reading level books during independent reading time and while all students are
given one or two things to work on in their writing (currently the majority of
the students are working on dialogue and creating multiple coherent paragraphs
in their writing) my CT coaches this advanced student on more technical aspects
of writing because she is developmentally ready for it.
While I have become more aware of developmental diversity in
Ireland that affects equity and social justice practices, Ireland’s homogeneous
culture has not allowed me to learn much about equitable teaching to a
culturally and ethnically diverse classroom. All of the students in my
classroom come from very similar Irish catholic families within the same
socioeconomic level. Unlike my previous placements in Boston, which were
culturally and racially diverse, Irish schools lack ethnic diversity. In
Boston, I would often observe how my CTs would incorporate the cultures of
their diverse students into lessons through book selections, cultural references,
and art projects. The students’ heritages were celebrated and infused into
lesson plans. I have observed very little of culturally aware teaching
practices in Ireland as all of the pupils are of the dominant culture. A couple
of weeks ago, Scoil Mhuire, celebrated “French week” where the students learned
about the French culture. French culture was not infused into pre-existing
lessons, but was approached as a separate subject all together, and the
information presented was all very stereotypical: simple French phrases and
feasting on croissants, crepes, and baguettes. It was very stereotypical and
provided a surface-level understanding of French culture. I think without
having diverse students in ones classroom that forces a teacher to be mindful
of how cultural diversity is presented, it can be challenging to present
diversity in culturally aware and authentic ways, rather than setting up
diversity as a celebrated week of stereotypes.
Completing an international practicum in Ireland has opened my eyes to the wide range of developmental and maturity levels that may exist in a single classroom and how this affects differentiation and teaching practices. Simultaneously, I have also gained a greater appreciation for the diversity of culture within Boston schools that is missing from the Irish culture, and how such diversity makes culturally aware teaching practices more authentic and easier to avoid a stereotypical and surface level understanding of diversity.
Implementing a mini-unit on Native Americans at Scoil Mhuire
It has been a while since I last wrote an
international practicum blog post. I have been doing some travelling outside of
Ireland for the past three weeks and Scoil Mhuire additionally has had their
two-week spring holiday, luckily corresponding with my holiday as well. This
blog post is reflecting back quite a ways, to the very first week of April,
when I last visited the third-class students.
Having had the entire first week of April off
from classes, and knowing that I would be outside of Cork for the majority of April and that May would be hectic with finals, I decided the easiest method
to fulfill a large portion of the ten required student teaching days would be
for me to student teach for an entire week straight. I am thankful for the flexibility of this
program. Having only completed pre-practicums back at Boston College, I have
only had the experience of student teaching one day a week. I found it to be a
very eye-opening and rewarding experience to be able to attend student teaching
for a full workweek; it provided insight into what my full-practicum and future
as an elementary teacher will be like.
It was a lot more exhausting than I had
anticipated. In addition to observing my CT teach her lessons, monitoring lunch
and recess, and tutoring two struggling students in math, I had taken on
teaching a three-day Native American mini-unit. When I wasn’t at Scoil Mhuire
as a student teacher, I was at home planning lessons for the following morning.
It felt as though my life was consumed by student teaching, lesson planning,
and preparation. While I thoroughly enjoyed it and feel fortunate to have had
this glimpse into my future as a full-practicum student, I had underestimated
how exhausting it would be.
My first lesson in the mini-unit was an overview
of who the Native Americans were and what the different tribal regions within
the USA were (Woodlands, Plains, Southwest, and Coastal Northwest). The
students learned about the geography of the United States by coloring a map. My
second lesson was about the Plains Indians and the buffalo hunt, where I taught
the students all the different things a Native American made with different
parts of a buffalo’s body (they labeled a diagram of a buffalo with the
different things Native Americans made with each body part). The final lesson
was about Coastal Northwest Americans, the totem pole, and storytelling. I
explained how totem poles told stories of the tribes history, read them the
legend of the Thunderbird, and then implemented an art project where each student
designed their own totem pole with a mixture of native American symbols and symbols
of things that were personally significant to them (many picked the shamrock).
I thought the week went really well. It felt
so different teaching a room of only nine female students (one student was away
this week on holiday). The dynamic was so different from the 18 and 23
mixed-gender classrooms that were my previous student teaching placements. Due
to the reduction in class size, classroom management wasn’t that big of a factor. Yes, I still
had to remind them not to call out of turn, and to raise their hand when they
had a question or wanted to answer a question, but for the most part they were
very focused, attentive, and respectful.
In observing my CT implement lessons, I
already have noticed that the teaching style at my Scoil Mhuire placement is a
lot more laidback than other placements I have had in America. In implementing
my own mini-unit during the first week of March, I have experienced this
different teaching style first hand. For
one thing, although I know there are curriculum standards and objectives, these
objectives (expect in the area of mathematics) are not made clear within lesson
implementation to me or to the students. Unlike previous placements where the
students could articulate what they were learning because the classroom teacher
had made her objectives clear to the students
(orally, through writing the objective on the board, and by indicating
that there would be an assessment on the topic), the students at Scoil Mhuire
are for the most part unable to articulate the purpose of a lesson. There seems
to be much less focus on curriculum standards than within the American system, although
this could just be the result of my CT not making her lesson plans and
objectives clear to me. Nevertheless, when planning my Native American
mini-unit, I wasn’t given any instructions, resources, or curriculum guides
about what information or skills the students were expected to learn. Rather,
my CT said it was “my unit and I could approach it however I wanted to”. The
lack of guidance made planning difficult as I was uncertain on which information
and skills to focus.
The testing procedures are also very
different between this school and American schools. I am accustomed to the American system, riddled with continuous assessments and little quizzes that inform teachers of the effectiveness of their teaching practices and their students comprehension of the lesson. In my lesson, I attempted to include continuous assessment through worksheets and class discussion so the students could demonstrate what they learned. I even made a matching quiz for the next morning to see how much information the students had retained. These were implemented so I could assess how effective my teaching had been and address any misconceptions the students may have. While my CT does
incorporate continuous assessment, through worksheets and listening to her
students responses during conversations to make certain they are on target,
there are not a lot of within unit or end of unit quizzes or tests spread
throughout term. Rather, the students have two or three days of exams at the
end of term before leaving for their holidays. All of the testing for each
subject occurs during this testing period at the end of term. I found this to
be very different from the American schools I’ve taught in, where tests were
spread out and occurred naturally to assess progress and inform teachers of the
effectiveness of their teaching practices, rather than (or in addition to) a finalized assessment
of what the student learned.
Overall, it was an incredibly eye opening experience to attend my placement for an entire week straight and implement a mini-unit during this week of student teaching. It provided insight into my future experiences as a full-practicum student and allowed me to better observe some of the academic differences between Scoil Mhuire and American school in which I have taught.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)