Most of the activities I worked with in the history lessons involved
analysing a primary source and determining authorship, bias, and the meaning of
it in the greater context of history. Being able to analyse this type of source
seemed to be the most important tool in the eyes of the teachers, as much of
the national exams for history involves questions based off of these sources. Having
witnessed so much time being dedicated to this single skill, the concern of
teaching to the test came up in my head. At the end of Year 11, all students
take national exams for each subject, and depending on both their expected
grades and actual grades, these test scores are what will be considered by
colleges and universities. In addition to the importance of these exams for the
students, they are also used as a measuring tool for evaluating teachers
similar to the way standardized tests are for teaching in America.
When discussing
these exams with one of my head teachers, he explained how he believes that the
English system of grading is unfair. Although it was created to get completely
objective results, it forces Year 11 students to take the ten most important
exams in their lives within a ten day period. At no other point in the
education system will a student be forced to prepare and cram in the same
manner, and those students who either have a learning disability or simply just
take longer to learn and revise suffer the most. To a certain degree, these
exams reward being able to write a lot of BS quickly rather than taking time to
think of a thoughtful answer when stuck on a question.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.