As Newbridge Primary School is a
publically funded school, it must follow the prescriptive demands of the
National Curriculum for all subjects: mathematics, English, science, history,
geography, citizenship, religious education, music, physical education, modern
foreign language, ICT, design and technology, and art and design. The list of the subjects themselves is quite
long, and the standards under each of them give teachers all across the country
a long checklist for their classrooms.
Some schools see this as incredibly daunting and restrictive, as they
work within the confines of the government’s ideas of what is best, but
Newbridge is not one of these schools.
John Crocker, the headteacher (principal equivalent), does not see the National Curriculum as weight on his
school, but rather as a rough guide as to what teacher’s should interweave into
their classroom communities. The whole
school works together to decide the best curricular path for its students and
then sees how the National Curriculum will fit.
Unfortunately, I only really saw Miss Amies teach, although I visited
two other classrooms briefly on spate occasions. In addition, I did not observe Miss Amies
teach nearly half of these subjects as each Wednesday followed the same
routine. These together limit my
experience, and thus understanding, of Newbridge’s delivery of the National
Curriculum. I witnessed a literacy lesson on writing
every day I spent with Miss Amies and even had the opportunity to teach one
myself. I can confidently say that
although Miss Amies, and the rest of the educators, do not make the National
Curriculum a priority, lessons all tie back to some aspect of it in the end.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.