This semester I was very lucky to student teach while I was
abroad in Dublin, Ireland. I was able to observe and become a part of a third
grade class at St. Andrew’s College, a catholic, private, and preparatory
school. The male teacher I observing has been a teacher for over twenty years
and displays a great joy for teaching that makes it easy to understand why his
students are so eager to learn and love being a part of the classroom
environment he has created. My CT was playful and joking with his class but
also developed respect from his students that allowed him to still be an
authority figure in their eyes. It is easy to see that my CT knows his students
really well and about each of their individual needs as learners. For example,
we would have conversations about which student would require the most extra
attention from me and which were capable of focusing on their own. Other things
I noticed about my CT and his classroom was the similar use of technology to
enhance learning that I observed in my first practicum experience last year.
The classroom was equipped with iPads for all students, a smart board for
presentations, and an ELMO projector. My CT utilized this technology in many
ways to enhance learning and present material in new and interesting ways for
his students. He definitely recognized the benefits of using technology and
thus was adept at using it in exciting ways. For these reasons, it was easy to
recognize similarities between Irish and American schools and teachers. I am
not sure what I was expecting but do not think I was expecting to find the two
school systems to be similar in so many ways.
My time teaching abroad also exposed
me to some of the differences between the American school system and those of other
countries. The first main difference I noticed was my CT’s reliance on lectures
instead of group work or individual quiet working time. In most of his lessons,
my CT stood at the front of the classroom and spoke with the help of a
powerpoint or other presentation on the smartboard to help guide the class. My
CT facilitated engagement in the lessons by calling on students and structuring
it as a back and forth. However, I was interested because I never saw the class
broken up into groups to discuss an assignment or work together to solve a
problem. I also did not see individual work very much unless it was an exam. This
teaching style was very different from what I saw during my first practicum but
seemed to fit my CT’s personality as well as the nature of the classroom that
he had created. Another difference I observed was this school’s emphasis on
cultural studies. The students learned two languages, either Spanish or French as
well as learning the Irish language. It was very interesting to observe an Irish
language lesson because it is such an interesting language. It is law in Ireland
for the language to be taught in schools in order to preserve the language that
had been dying out with the prevalence of the use of the English language in
the county.
All in all, with the similarities
and differences I observed between American and Irish school systems, I cannot
decide which I find to be the most effective. I think for the most part it
depends on the teacher’s abilities and personality to determine which teaching
style would be most effective. Depending on which learning style a teacher is
most comfortable with will help determine if they are effective in their
classroom. I learned a lot during my time in Ireland and from watching my CT
and I am excited to bring this information back with me and apply it to my
future practicums at BC.
Hi Julia, I really enjoyed reading about your experience in Ireland! I was just wondering how your CT managed to give students individual attention when his teaching style was mostly lecture style?
ReplyDelete